We have elected some new elders in our
congregation. As part of their
orientation, I offer an introduction to the Constitution of the PCUSA. It is not systematic, but my
idiosyncratic take on it. I start
with the first thesis of the Theological Declaration of Barmen.
It goes like this:
Jesus Christ, as he is attested for us in Holy Scripture, is the
one Word of God which we have to hear and which we have to trust and obey in
life and in death.
We reject the false doctrine, as though the church could and would
have to acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and besides
this one Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as
God’s revelation.
1.
The only Jesus Christ we have
is the one “attested for us in Holy Scripture.” There is no other or new Jesus Christ that someone has
identified through any other means: mystical, theological, scientific, or
artistic. Non-scriptural
presentations of Jesus Christ are valid for disciples only in so far as they
reflect, depict, and shed light on the Jesus Christ we know in Scripture. It is the height of arrogance, hubris,
presumption, and cynicism for anyone to imagine that they have a truer picture
of Jesus than the one we receive in the gospels, based on accounts of people
who knew him personally. The
gospel portrayals are diverse and even contradictory, which only verifies their
authenticity.
2.
There is no division between Jesus and Christ; that is, there is no “historical
Jesus” who is somehow distinct from the “Christ of faith.” They are identical and
inseparable. Jesus is always and
only the Messiah of the Jews, the Savior and Redeemer promised in the Hebrew
Scriptures, the Incarnate Son of God, who rose from the dead. Christ is always and only the Human
One, born of Mary, who was executed by the Romans “for blasphemy and sedition”
(Brief Statement of Faith, 10.2). Christ is not a layer of misinterpretation
imposed by the later church; in the Scriptures Jesus clearly understands
himself to be the Messiah. To
separate them is to do violence to the text and concoct two different and
imaginary figures, a project that must serve some end other than witnessing to
God’s love.
3.
Jesus Christ is himself the Word of God. So while the Scriptures attest to him, he attests to the
Scriptures. The Scriptures get
their authority from him. “The one
sufficient revelation of God is Jesus Christ, the Word of God incarnate, to
whom the Holy Spirit bears unique and authoritative witness through the Holy
Scriptures, which are received and obeyed as the word of God written” (Confession of 1967, 9.27). The Scriptures are the word of God
because and when they witness to the Word of God, Jesus Christ. They are never accurately understood
when they are heard to say something in contradiction to Jesus Christ.
4.
Our response is to hear, trust, and obey Jesus Christ. It is not to hear only, and then do as
we please. It is not even to
“believe,” if by that we mean merely to have an intellectual opinion about
him. It is to demonstrate our
whole-hearted trust in him by our obedience to his commandments, as individuals
and as a community.
5.
Our trust in Jesus Christ extends throughout this mortal life even unto
our death. Nothing can ever
separate us from God’s love in Jesus Christ.
6.
What are some “other events and powers, figures and truths,” that some
might acknowledge as “a source of
the church’s proclamation”? In
other words, what forces and influences do we find within the church today that
somehow manage to be considered when we are making decisions? These are the other “principalities and
powers” that demand allegiance, loyalty, and obedience. Among these are nation, race, class,
culture, political ideology, tradition, personality, economic system,
philosophy, and religion. If we
are acknowledging any of these, even in a subordinate or marginal way, as
factors influencing the character of our trust in and obedience of the Lord
Jesus Christ, we are not loving God with our whole being or our neighbors as
ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment