Day Three.
1.
General Assembly on Monday began with Bible Study, led by Deborah Krause, a professor at Eden Seminary, here in St. Louis. She presented a “monumental” reading of Mark’s gospel, which means it takes into account the Roman strategy of nailing their colonialism in place by establishing stone monuments in public places. Such monuments, like arches, were spatial declarations of Rome’s power. They intentional told conquered peoples they were defeated losers who dare not challenge Rome.
This adds meaning to Paul’s words in Romans 12:1-2, “Do not be pressed down,” “but be transformed.” In other words, do not become a brick in the system. The heart of the NT is resistance of Roman rule.
Krause used Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz’ term, “kindom,” to talk about the alternative structure to the Empire presented in Jesus’ ministry. Mark’s gospel is a virtual memorial to the life of Jesus, showing his movements and his interrogations of different spaces. This begins with the house/household, which he consistently calls people out of. Jesus’ ministry is centered in the streets, in the midst of the crowds of ordinary people.
Finally, Krause identified the same imperialistic use of monuments even here in St. Louis. The monumental Gateway Arch, which sticks conquest and genocide in the face of the Native peoples whose land was stolen, and the downtown Courthouse framed by the arch, which is the site of the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that African Americans had no legal standing. These two monuments basically yell white supremacy at defeated and oppressed people.
Jesus forms a different kind of community, one of equality, healing, and justice.
2.
I went to the luncheon sponsored by the Israel Palestine Mission Network, which talked about the colonialism of Israel against the indigenous people there. Non-Jews form a majority of the population in the area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, yet Israel controls 93% of the land. Thus the Palestinians today are in a position analogous to that of the people living in the same area in the time of Jesus: they are conquered and colonized, ruled over by a minority. The only permanent solution to the protracted crisis in the Middle East is respect for the rights of all. Which is to say, kindom instead of kingdom.
3.
I sat in as an observer to the committee concerned with environment, mainly because I was sent to the assembly as an official advocate for an overture that Palisades Presbytery concurred with.
- I was frustrated by the argument that since we unavoidably use fossil fuels, it is hypocritical to advocate removing our money from the industry that produces them. But the issue before the General Assembly was not a carbon-free lifestyle, but simply a matter of where we invest our money. We can use fossil fuels, and still not want to support or benefit from this industry financially.
- The speaker from MRTI (Mission Responsibility Through Investment, a group that oversees our work with the companies we have investments with) talked about a “bold new plan” she called “game changing…” but then she affirmed staying engaged in a conversation with these companies. The most we’ve been able to squeeze out of years of conversation with these companies are vague promises to someday consider changing their language. A bold new plan that would actually get them to change their behavior is not on the table.
- I can understand the resistance to divestment from a group like MRTI. It would remove them from corporate board rooms and diminish their influence. But in rejecting divestment for a second consecutive assembly, the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy once again demonstrated its own irrelevance and lack of vision in favor of institutional loyalty. Indeed, the entire PMA loses credibility and reveals itself to be invested in a Christendom model of “engagement” with secular principalities and powers. ACSWP is supposed to be on the side of justice. They have become so thoroughly establishment as to be basically useless. I read their stuff, shrug, roll my eyes, and move on.
4.
It occurs to me that Robert’s Rules is inherently contrary to the kindom focus of Christianity. Robert’s has an inherent adversariality and drive towards win-lose decisions that spawns, highlights, and exacerbates differences in privilege. It drives towards an inequality that is contrary to the kindom vision.
No comments:
Post a Comment