Some
of you may have heard of Spiral Dynamics.
It is a remarkable system of identifying developmental stages in the
human psyche and in history.
Without going into great detail, I want to talk about the stages that
are impacting our life today. (The
colors are assigned arbitrarily to aid conversation.) If you haven’t heard of this system there are good, brief
descriptions that can be unearthed by a search engine.
Each
stage develops to solve the problems of the previous one. There are two early stages relating
mainly to primitive humanity. Then
Red is the stage of warlords and retributive, tribal violence. It is balanced by the next stage, which
is Blue, about order and conformity.
Which in turn moves into Orange, having to do with freedom,
entrepreneurialism, and exchange.
Orange is balanced by the more communal and socially responsible
Green. These stages constitute
tier one. Tier two begins with
Yellow. Yellow is the first one
that looks at the whole spiral, all the colors and how they relate. Yellow is about competency and
accomplishment.
That
is a ridiculously inadequate summary of a small part of the system. But my point is that different people
are at different stages of development, and addressing them in that context
helps.
At
this point, I think we have to say that no
value judgment is implied by the idea of stages. It is not hierarchical in terms of power or goodness. People at Green are not “better” or even
really “more advanced” than people at Red. They are simply at different places dealing with different
issues in ways that work for them at that time. Yes, as people at a given stage run up against the weaknesses
inherent in that stage, they begin to move into the next stage. But anyone who thinks being at a
“higher” stage makes them more entitled to wield power over others has missed
the point, and probably for that reason isn’t really as “evolved” as they think
they are. This is especially true in
the second tier of Yellow and then Turquoise, which are characterized by
increasing humility, selflessness, and sharing.
In
any case, I am using the system to analyze the current disintegration of the
PCUSA. What is happening is that
churches that relate best to Blue and Orange are finding it uncomfortable in a
denomination that is relating increasingly to Green, and now to Yellow. This was made really clear when I was
part of a delegation meeting with the session of a church seeking to leave the
denomination. We went around the
room and the elders spoke of their feelings, motivation, and the timing of this
decision. And to a person what we
heard were the values of Blue: conformity, order, a clear understanding of
right-and-wrong, biblical authority, wanting definite answers, and absolute
standards. The things they were
complaining about in the PCUSA were the values of Green: openness, questioning
authority, inclusion of other voices and opinions, the “big tent” approach,
laxity in doctrine, and weak discipline.
But they, being at Blue, did not even begin to comprehend Green at all; what
they see in the denomination is weakness, disorder, relativism, and a
regression to a kind of paganism.
They see a regression back to Purple and Red. These Blue Christians do comprehend Orange because America,
especially economically, is an Orange country. (Protestantism is pretty Orange as well.) So their world is the Blue discipline
of traditional Christian morality moderating the potential excesses of Orange
commercial capitalism. That is the
world to them, and for them, it works very well. The idea of a communal, inclusive, justice-oriented Green
mode as a positive balancing of the depredations of a restrictive Blue and an
out-of-control Orange, is incomprehensible to them.
Until
recently, as the gap was opening and widening between the Green majority and
the Blue/Orange minority, there was almost unmitigated and increasing
hostility. There is a
self-righteousness to Green that, like the other preceding stages, consciously
sees itself as better and more highly evolved. This comes across as superior and judgmental towards
Blue/Orange. We don’t need to
imagine how this goes over with them.
The one thing that conservatives seem most bitter about is this nasty
sneering at them because of their “bigotry” and “backwardness.” They see themselves upholding order, responsibility,
civilization, and prosperity.
On
top of all this, we have a polity that is rooted in the 16th century
and is very Blue/Orange: it creates order by making winners and losers, it gives
power to some over others, it demands conformity and compliance, and it values
decision-making. So we have Green
people managing a Blue/Orange system, and using it to further an agenda that
inherently undermines the system itself.
(Witness, in the battle over Gay inclusion, the Green flouting of the
rules, culminating in the 2014 Authoritative Interpretation that basically
decides that the words of the Book of
Order mean the opposite of what they say. This drives Blue people nuts because even when they
dutifully play by the rules and win, they still lose. But for Greens, “justice” can’t be deterred by some stupid
rules.)
Lately,
however, some elements of the denomination are experiencing Yellow. Yellow recognizes the weaknesses of
Green as wooly-headed, romantic, sentimental, naïve, unrealistic, hypocritical,
sanctimonious, and cruel. Green
also makes cynical alliances with Red against Blue and Orange, meaning that
they can excuse and rationalize manifestations of tribal violence in the name
of respect for different cultures.
(And nothing scares Blue and Orange than the disorder and chaos of a Red
system that Blue grew out of… centuries ago.) Yellow looks at the whole spiral, and realizes that Blue and
Orange have value, as well as Green, and we should build on the positive in
each stage. Yellow does not reject
the prior stages, but includes them and moves beyond them with their good
energies.
So
the Yellow-influenced approach in the church listens carefully to the concerns
of Blue/Orange Presbyterians, and is willing to give them the room to work at
that stage. Some people are at
that stage and need it. Like all
the stages, Blue and Orange need to work well for people, even as some come
against the limitations and drawbacks, and emerge into Green themselves. Yellow recognizes that declaring a
Blue/Orange vs. Green war over property in local presbyteries is
counter-productive, debilitating, pointless, and incredibly and tragically
short-sighted.
But,
even though the denomination is Green moving into Yellow, its structure remains
deep Blue and Orange. There is the
hierarchical order of representative government, overlaid with the vestiges of
the corporate model that dominated in the 1950’s. Which means that, even as the Blue people are departing, we still have structures and system that do
not match the mostly Green values of the people, let alone reflect the emerging
values of Yellow.
The
new Form of Government is a start.
But there are still orthodoxies in our polity that can be dispensed with,
making the church more effective and authentic in its mission.
+++++++
1 comment:
Paul: This is brilliant.
Post a Comment