Luke 24.13-32
I.
It
is the Sunday after Jesus’ execution.
A disciple of Jesus named Cleopas is walking from Jerusalem to Emmaus,
about 7 miles, with a companion who is probably his wife, Mary. They are, as we might imagine, traumatized
over the brutal killing of their teacher.
It was only the previous Thursday evening that Jesus was alive and doing
a Passover seder for his inner circle. But, like most of the disciples, they
woke up Friday morning to discover Jesus already on trial for his life. He was crucified and dead before they
could even try to do anything about
it. Then earlier that day they
heard from some women disciples who went to Jesus’ tomb and instead of finding
his body they were met by figures they identified as angels, who said Jesus was
alive.
It
was a lot to talk about. The
church has also been in sustained conversation for 2000 years about “these
things that have taken place.” We
have been discussing, debating, theorizing, and reflecting on the cross and
resurrection of Jesus, all this time, coming up with a variety of doctrines,
hypotheses, and stories, trying to wrap our minds around what is, ultimately, a
great mystery…. We can discuss and
converse and reflect among ourselves all we want, and still not come up with
any satisfactory answers.
A
stranger appears on the road as they are walking, a stranger who at first appears
to be remarkably clueless about the events of the past few days. So the two walkers explain to him what
happened.
Then
this stranger launches into an extended theological discourse, beginning with:
“Oh, how foolish you are, and how slow of heart to believe all that the
prophets have declared! Was it not
necessary that the Messiah should suffer these things and then enter into his
glory?” So the man does know what has been happening, and
he even purports to know what it all means. And he proceeds to interpret the
Scriptures, beginning with Moses, which is to say, the Torah, and the prophets, about the Messiah.
My
guess is that the man, whom we know
to be the risen Jesus, brings in Exodus 12, about the Passover Lamb, whose
blood was spread in the doorways of the Israelites, to ward away the angel of
death during the exodus from Egypt. He surely mentioned some of the readings from last night,
like the Flood and Ezekiel’s valley of dry bones. I think he also added passages are usually read on Good Friday:
the Suffering Servant in Isaiah 53, and maybe Psalm 22, which Jesus himself
quotes on the cross in Mark’s gospel.
He probably draws as well on Leviticus 16, the ritual for the Day of
Atonement in which the blood of a goat dedicated to the Lord was used to
reconcile God to the people, while another goat bore their sins away into the
desert.
II.
Now,
nowhere in the Old Testament does it explicitly say, in so many words: “the coming
Messiah must suffer and die, and then enter his glory.” But Jesus would have pointed out story
after story in which God’s deliverance and redemption overcome our bondage and suffering.
The
truth is that God always manages to
transform our evil into goodness.
God’s light always banishes
our darkness. God’s life finally overcomes the power of death. Justice and life and freedom and love always triumph. It just doesn’t always happen in what
we think is the right time and place.
Mahatma
Gandhi said (in the movie at least) that when he despairs, he remembers that
the way of truth and love has always won.
Martin Luther King said that the arc of history is long but it always
bends towards justice. The message
here is: “It gets better!” They
were not naïve optimists; both of these men were assassinated. Yet they witnessed to a truth that is
bigger than they were. The apostle
Paul saw that this truth is embodied in Jesus Christ, and he expresses this in
his magnificent conclusion to Romans 8: Nothing, not even death, is able to
separate us from God’s love revealed in Jesus Christ.
Jesus
is walking with these two disciples, having passed through the barrier of death
itself. And he is frustrated a bit
because these disciples don’t get it.
They don’t recognize him because the last thing their minds are
expecting is to see Jesus alive. They
are dwelling on the crime of Jesus’ execution; they receive the news of the
empty tomb with puzzlement. They are looking at this situation from
the perspective of what they have lost,
suffered, feared, and what frustrates and depresses them.
We
can read the Bible from this
perspective. We can concentrate on
the floods and plagues and slavery and exile and illness and war, thereby
concluding that God is an angry monster lusting for blood, finally, according
to some, only appeased by the blood of his own son. This is to look at the Bible, and at our own history and
experience, as a dismal catalogue of destruction, disease, and death, swirling
down the drain to extinction. All
the positive stuff only happens after we die or at the end of time.
Or
we can read it from the perspective of resurrection,
letting our understanding be formed by the words of the stranger who doubtless
lifts up the redemptive, transforming, saving, resolution to all these horrible situations. Saying, look: God is always rescuing us. No matter how bad it gets, God pulls us out, and new life emerges. This is even more powerful because we
know who the stranger is: the Crucified One who has conquered death by death,
and now lives eternally.
III.
The
trio on the road finally approach Emmaus, where the couple is heading. The stranger keeps walking on, intending
to go farther, but they strongly urge him to stay with them for dinner, as it
is getting late. So he does.
When
they sit down at the table to eat the stranger takes a sheet of the matzah (it is still Passover). He blesses it: Baruch atah Adonai eloheynu, melech ha olam, la motzi lechem min ha
aretz. He snaps it in two, and
gives the pieces to them.
Luke
says: “Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him; and he vanished
from their sight.”
It
is when he breaks the bread that they recognize
him. Something about his cracking
apart the pieces of matzah also
breaks open their consciousness. They are suddenly able to see a reality
they were unable to see before.
Even earlier, when he was metaphorically “breaking open the bread of
life” for them, by teaching them from the Scriptures, they didn’t quite get it. It is only now, when they have this visual, auditory, tactile, even olfactory experience
are they able to know Christ’s presence.
In
John’s gospel, Jesus refers to himself
and his teachings as the Bread of Life.
So here we have the confluence or the weaving together of the
Scriptures, the Sacrament, and Jesus’ own giving of himself on the cross, and
these have to be taken and known together. Jesus’ death on the cross is not just
an inevitable murder, a sad and horrible historical event uniting him to
oppressed and suffering people of all times and places. It is that, to be sure. But it is also more than that. That
is the level the disciples were still on when they began this walk home to Emmaus. But they can’t stay
at this level, the level of loss, and pain, and fear, and defeated resignation,
and dead, unredeemed, historical fact.
And
neither can we. If we do, the powers of evil that killed Jesus
win again. They have their violent
way with the world forever. And humanity
continues to ping-pong from misery to disaster to disease and finally to death,
in a descending spiral until we destroy ourselves and this planet. Which is the path humanity continues to
choose.
When
we reduce the story of Jesus to one of the inevitable death of a good person at
the hands of an evil regime, it only hardens our heart, toughens us for a
continued battle, and further empowers the forces of fear, anger, and
hatred. If Jesus’ death stays a
tragedy, it leads us nowhere. And we trudge home to start our lives
over, waiting for something new to happen, because this Jesus thing wasn’t it.
IV.
But
an encounter with the risen Lord is an awakening of hope in the human heart.
We begin to imagine that it
doesn’t have to be this way.
The world does not have to be a spiral of violence and injustice, into
oblivion.
The
effect of an encounter with the risen Lord, even
if we don’t know that is who we are encountering, is to open us to other possibilities, other answers than
the traditional “life sucks, then you die” we learn all too early, or to responses
other than the reaction of violence and greed, gluttony and fear, anger and
control.
The
breaking of Jesus’ body drives us to break open the “bread of life” which is
the Scriptures. And there, under
the risen Lord’s influence, and through his interpretive lens, we find that,
while we human beings have lived in a way so contrary to creation’s plan that
we continually draw down upon ourselves the destructive consequences, that is never the end.
God,
the God who gave the whole place a beginning, is always making new
beginnings. God is always speaking
life and order and goodness and blessing into our chaotic maelstrom of
death. No matter how bad it gets,
God always rescues the people and delivers them to a new place, a place better
than the one they left.
So,
with this insight, we can get a handle on this cognitively. We can understand better the actual
trajectory of history. We have
reason to hope now, because we see
that not only does it not have to be
this way, but it really isn’t “this
way” at all. History is not the
entropic collapse of life into death, but the triumphal ascent of life into the
light of God. “The light shines in
the darkness and the darkness cannot overcome it.”
At
this point the disciples may feel
better, but they haven’t changed. The saving presence of the living Lord
is still invisible to them. He’s
given them something to think
about. But they are not changed
yet. They have heard the good
news, and they are considering it.
But it hasn’t touched them in
a visceral way yet.
It’s
still an intellectual experience.
It’s about ideas and interpretations, seeing the Scriptures in a new
way, even seeing history and our lives in a new way. And that’s all good.
But they don’t yet see the living presence of the King with them and
within them.
V.
From
the beginning of Christianity, worship has involved the two movements that
Jesus invokes here: Word and Sacrament.
On the road he retells the story; in the house he enacts the story by
taking, blessing, breaking, and giving the bread. It was something all his disciples saw him do countless
times.
So
also, when we worship we share the story, then, in obedience of him, we enact
the story in a symbolic meal in which we eat bread representing the Lord’s body
and drink the cup representing his blood.
It is that action, in which we are actually doing something and not just thinking
about it, that seals the Word and
stamps it into us at our deepest place.
We are not just doing anything but we are eating and drinking, we are
literally taking nourishment into our bodies. What we take in becomes what we are.
When
Jesus breaks the bread, he also shatters whatever barrier was still keeping
these disciples from seeing. And
through that broken bread, the light floods into their hearts, and into their
world. And they finally recognize
their teacher and anonymous companion as the risen Lord Jesus.
The
breaking of the bread is the small action that enables a whole new world to be
realized in our hearts and in our lives.
When we eat the bread we are literally changed, as we are when we eat
anything of course. But in this
case, because of the stories behind it, and the words we say over it, and the
hope with which we receive it, when we eat this
bread we are eating God, we are
becoming divine.
The
bread cracks in his hands, and the disciples suddenly recognize who was with
them all along. Jesus doesn’t
change. They change. The whole way they see the world
changes. Now it is a world blessed
and inhabited by God, in Jesus Christ.
May
our celebration today, when we break the bread, open our eyes. May we realize God’s saving presence
all around us. May we see the face of Christ in our sisters and brothers today. And may we live in the joy of
discipleship this day and every day.
No comments:
Post a Comment