Many
people appear to believe that the Bible and Jesus teach “personal
responsibility.” By personal
responsibility they mean that each individual should be personally responsible
for themselves and their families.
This means making wise and prudent decisions in their own best
interests, not depending or relying upon assistance from anyone else. It means working hard to get ahead and
taking reasonable risks investing their assets. It means keeping the commandments by not stealing, killing, or
lying in their personal relationships.
It means not disrespecting their parents. It means accepting the consequences of their own actions, not
cheating, complaining, or blaming others for their situation. It means keeping one’s word.
All
these virtues are interpreted very individualistically. They concern what you as an individual
do in your own life. And this
understanding of personal responsibility is based on another convenient assumption,
that everyone has an equal shot in life.
There is an “even playing field” and everyone has to abide by the same
rules. Your life is purely what
you personally make of it. The
feeling is that if everyone showed personal responsibility in this way, society
would be much better off.
And
it probably would. But this is not
what the Bible or Jesus teach.
They don’t teach this view of personal responsibility because some of
the premises are very wrong.
Scripture understands that, left to their own devices, human beings do not adopt the same rules for
everyone. Neither is there in
reality anything like an even playing field. Every person does not come into the world with the same
abilities, opportunities, or prospects.
Indeed, the Bible understands that even adopting “the same rules” for
everyone on paper or in theory isn’t even possible. The very same rules may happen to favor some and jeopardize
others, based on their different circumstances. Thus the enactment of a philosophy of personal
responsibility means that the privileged consolidate their power at everyone
else’s expense. That is why it is
invariably the privileged who are most likely self-righteously to prate about personal
responsibility. Exercising personal
responsibility results in a society in which the power of the wealthy, strong,
healthy, well-born, intelligent, and good-looking ever increases, and that of
everyone else declines. The
negative example of this was always Egypt. Egypt stands as a continual warning of how bad a society can
get – slavery – and the consequences – ecological disaster.
The
Bible remembers with some bitterness that a male child born a Hebrew slave in
Pharaoh’s Egypt does not have anything like the same chances in life as a male
child raised in Pharaoh’s royal household… and it gives us Moses as an example
of both. Slaves have no
personal responsibility because responsibility for them has been forcefully
usurped by stronger powers, exercising their own personal responsibility. The same goes for people born poor,
sick, aliens, outcast, excluded, or otherwise deemed by the personally
responsible to be deficient.
Therefore,
God gives the new nation of escaped slaves a new way of living. Since the free exercise of individual,
personal responsibility leads inexorably to the tyranny of the strong over the
weak, as in Egypt, God institutes a alternative, contrary way of communal and
mutually shared responsibility for each other. God gives the people a law which is intended to make them
into an anti-Egypt where everyone is equal under God.
This
law is, of course, summed up in the Ten Commandments. Briefly, the Commandments instruct us in mutual, shared
responsibility by first asserting the primacy of God over all. The has the effect of leveling society,
mitigating against the idea that some (the personally responsible who get ahead
because of their privilege) are better than others. God says no to this and to the religious expression of this
philosophy, idolatry: making something or someone who isn’t God into God. God institutes the Sabbath to ensure
that the demands of economic production, that place where the personally
responsible most effectively wield their power, do not consume 100% of a
person’s life. God would have the
people remember others, beginning with their own parents, representing former
generations, traditions, and the Earth.
Then the four main tools by which the personally responsible enforce
their privilege – murder, adultery, theft, and lying – are prohibited. Finally, the people are enjoined from
envying or coveting what belongs to others. This works both ways: the personally responsible often envy the
wealth generated by others’ work, and therefore connive to acquire it, and
people are not to desire for themselves the fruits of being privileged over
others.
If
anything, Jesus is even more severe.
When a poor or sick person comes or is brought to him, Jesus does not
give them a sermon about how they need to be more personally responsible. He acts immediately to alleviate the
suffering. His advice to rich
people who ask for it is basically, “Go and sell everything you have and give
the proceeds to the poor; then come and follow me.” In other words, “exercise your personal responsibility by
doing the thing you consider most irresponsible.”
For
the Bible, then, we are only personally responsible for each other. When
inequalities emerge, we are responsible to ensure that those who have more
contribute to those who have less.
The most important personal responsibilities we have are for other
persons. When we are living for
others is when we are being most personally responsible, as far as Scripture is
concerned. However, if you are
using your personal responsibility as a pretext for criticism of the underprivileged,
as if they got that way because of their own lack of personal responsibility,
well, neither Jesus nor the Bible has much patience with this self-righteous,
hateful view.
No comments:
Post a Comment